<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Animated GIF</title>
	<link>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/</link>
	<description>Jeff talks about various things, though nothing very specific.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: pblanton</title>
		<link>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-607</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-607</guid>
					<description>http://hometown.aol.com/dtc131/OLDTNewsletter.htm

Scroll all the way to the bottom so you can experience the full rigors of the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hometown.aol.com/dtc131/OLDTNewsletter.htm" rel="nofollow">http://hometown.aol.com/dtc131/OLDTNewsletter.htm</a></p>
<p>Scroll all the way to the bottom so you can experience the full rigors of the page.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: graham</title>
		<link>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-268</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-268</guid>
					<description>I've disabled animated pix mainly because the tendency of people in forums to have brash and "busy" signature pix really annoys me. When I go to a forum page, I don't want to feel as if I'm in a 1970's disco!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve disabled animated pix mainly because the tendency of people in forums to have brash and &#8220;busy&#8221; signature pix really annoys me. When I go to a forum page, I don&#8217;t want to feel as if I&#8217;m in a 1970&#8217;s disco!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mary kate</title>
		<link>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-66</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-66</guid>
					<description>I agree with Adam. Fellas, I hate to break it to you, but to graphics geeks like me GIFS are still a quicker (and  easier-to-produce) alternative to full scale QT movies, RealPlayer, and all of those other things that require a lot more money, time, and server space. 

     Second, there is still a market out there. Not everybody can write in four or five code languages (explaining what MEL,  C++, ASCII, or anything like that to my mother is like trying to teach a chimp Flaubert) so people like me continue on with medieval methods for the technologically retarded.   When files become more compressible you may see otherwise, but until then, the GIF lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Adam. Fellas, I hate to break it to you, but to graphics geeks like me GIFS are still a quicker (and  easier-to-produce) alternative to full scale QT movies, RealPlayer, and all of those other things that require a lot more money, time, and server space. </p>
<p>     Second, there is still a market out there. Not everybody can write in four or five code languages (explaining what MEL,  C++, ASCII, or anything like that to my mother is like trying to teach a chimp Flaubert) so people like me continue on with medieval methods for the technologically retarded.   When files become more compressible you may see otherwise, but until then, the GIF lives.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Adam A.</title>
		<link>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-59</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-59</guid>
					<description>Nothing's wrong with animated gifs! 

I for one welcome our new spinning "@" symbol overlords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing&#8217;s wrong with animated gifs! </p>
<p>I for one welcome our new spinning &#8220;@&#8221; symbol overlords.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Adam M Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-41</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-41</guid>
					<description>So, before AjaxWar, I remember seeing ajax-y sites that had a div that popped up saying "processing" or "contacting server" OR non ajax-y sites that displayed animated gifs while certaint processing was happening on the server site but the image wouldn't be replace until the page refreshed.

Did I invent the practice of using small, square, rotating, animated gifs to indicate activity status in a simple manner without leaving the page on ajax applications?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, before AjaxWar, I remember seeing ajax-y sites that had a div that popped up saying &#8220;processing&#8221; or &#8220;contacting server&#8221; OR non ajax-y sites that displayed animated gifs while certaint processing was happening on the server site but the image wouldn&#8217;t be replace until the page refreshed.</p>
<p>Did I invent the practice of using small, square, rotating, animated gifs to indicate activity status in a simple manner without leaving the page on ajax applications?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-40</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogrium.com/2005/10/13/the-animated-gif/#comment-40</guid>
					<description>Ads tend to originate in the same places, animated GIFs are abused all over the place.

"On the whole" -- whatever that means -- I totally agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ads tend to originate in the same places, animated GIFs are abused all over the place.</p>
<p>&#8220;On the whole&#8221; &#8212; whatever that means &#8212; I totally agree with you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
